Diversity of Fruit Tree Species in Site II, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
This study was carried out with a view of documenting the fruit tree species diversity in the site II of Delta State University, Abraka in May 2021. Sampling for fruits diversity was carried out through direct observation within the study area. Photographs were taken to aid identification; accurate taxonomic references were employed in the process of identification of the specimens collected. Percentage distribution of the fruit tree species and families encountered were documented. From the results of the study area surveyed, a total number of 20 fruit tree species belonging to 13 families were enumerated. The distribution of the fruits based on frequency of occurrence in the visible head count of fruit trees showed that the Indian almond fruit tree species (Terminalia catappa) is most dominant with approximately 90%, followed by the coconut species (Cocos nucifera) and oil palm fruit specie (Elaeis guineensis) with approximately 50%, banana (Musa acuminata), mango (Mangifera indica) and orange (Citrus sinensis) with approximately 30%, pawpaw (Carica papaya), Guava (Psidium guajava), and Lime (Citrus aurantiifolia) with approximately 15%. Others recorded very low species with 5% occurrence, respectively. The study showed that fruits are diverse in the premises of site II of Delta State University, Abraka. The species are important in the ecosystem function and services; hence activities which could lead to their depletion should be controlled.
References
-
Agbogidi, O. M. (2019). Ecosystem services and management for better life. 80th in the series of inaugural lectures of the Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria delivered on the 10th of October 2019. 96p.
Google Scholar
1
-
Agbogidi, O. M., Enujeke, C. E., Odume, C. S., Agbogidi, O. M., & Odibo, O. J. (2022). Ethnobotanical uses of plants by the Ijaw people in Patani, Delta State, Nigeria. World Journal of Pharmaceutical and Life Sciences, 8 (1), 60-67.
Google Scholar
2
-
Charlton, K., Kowal, P., Sorano, M., Williams, S., & Banks, E. (2014). Fruit and vegetable intake and body mass index in a large sample of middle-aged Australian men and women. Nutrients. 6 (6), 2305-2319.
Google Scholar
3
-
Efe, S. I. and Aruegodore, P. (2003). Aspect of microclimates in Nigerian Rural Environment: The Abraka Experience. Nigeria Journal of Research and Production, 2 (3), 48-57.
Google Scholar
4
-
International Agency for Research on Cancer (2003). IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. Vol 8: Fruits and Vegetables. Lyon, IARC Press.
Google Scholar
5
-
Jenkins, S. & Horner, S. (2005). Barriers that influence eating behaviors in adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 20, 258.
Google Scholar
6
-
Spear, B.A. (2002). Adolescent growth and development. Journal of American Dietetic Association 102, 523-530.
Google Scholar
7
-
Temple, N. J. & Gladwin, K. K. (2003). Fruit, vegetables and the prevention of cancer: research challenges. Nutrition. 19, 467-470.
Google Scholar
8
-
Turcotte, M. (2010). Nutrition facts on fruits and vegetables. United States Department of Agriculture. 2011.Mushrooms classified under "Other vegetables‖. Retrieved June 2, 2011 from http:// www. choosemyplate.gov/food groups/vegetables. Html U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2005. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion.
Google Scholar
9
-
W.H.O (2003). Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation. Geneva, (WHO Technical ReportSeries, No.916).
Google Scholar
10
-
Wargovich, M. (2000). Anticancer properties of fruits and vegetables. Horticultural Science. 3 (5), 573-575.
Google Scholar
11